That stiff leather needs a real break-in period — it's not "wear-all-day" comfortable at first. Also, the pre-yellowed soles & cracks might not be for purists who want a "crisp" Chicago. And at this price point? Some might prefer a more "technologically" advanced Jordan model for performance. Just being honest. On foot, it's the classic AJ1 feel – which means don't expect modern, bouncy cushioning. It's firm, stable, and the ankle support is fantastic. The fit is true to size for me. Compared to a newer Jordan, like a 3 or a 4, it's definitely less plush, but that's not the point here. The point is the look. They scream '85 from every angle, and on camera, that vintage aesthetic just pops. It’s all about the style, not supreme comfort. Pros? The storytelling through design is A+. The aged midsole, the special box, the faux-1985 receipt... it’s a full experience. The colorway is arguably the greatest of all time. Cons? That stiff, break-in period is real. Also, the pre-distressed look might not be for everyone – some folks want a crisp, new shoe. And at this resale price? It's a big investment just for the look. Let's be honest—pros & cons time. Pro #1: It's arguably the best Chicago AJ1 release in years. The details (receipt, special box) are awesome. Pro #2: Incredibly versatile style. The cons? That classic AJ1 sole isn't the most cushioned. Also, the red leather is softer & might crease more noticeably. For $180, you're paying for the story & design, not tech.
