Aesthetics? It’s a chunky, outdoorsy take on the classic. On feet, they feel slightly different: the sole is a bit more forgiving & has great grip. They’re definitely heavier than a standard Low, though. Visually, they add some cool texture to a fit. Pro: Unique design & more functional sole. Con: The weight & bulkier silhouette might not be for purists. At around $130 USD, it’s a premium. I’d say it’s for someone who wants a durable, statement AJ1 Low. Probably not for fans of the OG slim profile. First lace-up of the "Air Jordan 1 Low" 'Starfish' and I'm digging the vibrancy. The comfort is "fine" - it's a flat, firm ride, which I don't mind for short walks. The real win is the silhouette; it's arguably "more" wearable for most people than the high-top. Who's it for? Anyone wanting a piece of Jordan series history in a low-profile package. Not for comfort-seekers. On foot, the look is undeniable. This low-top shape makes it way easier to wear with shorts, or just casual pants. Compared to a high-top AJ1, the "air jordan 1 low" is undeniably more "versatile" for daily wear. I'm rocking this "Panda" colorway, and it's just a clean, go-with-anything shoe. The "biggest" pro? Its styling is nearly impossible to mess up. What's up, everyone? Just got these "Air Jordan 1 Low" 'Obsidian' in. Unboxing is always a vibe with this series. The color-blocking here is "clean" – that white and blue combo pops. On foot, the fit is true to size for me, with a snug – not tight – feel. Compared to a mid or high-top Jordan 1, you obviously lose some ankle support, but you gain a ton of versatility. Major pro? These are summer-staple easy. Con? The outsole is thin; you'll feel the pavement. I'd recommend them for style-focused folks, not for performance ball.
