I went with my normal size, and the fit is perfect – no heel slip. Compared to something like a Dunk Low, the toe box feels a bit more structured. The big pro is the versatility; they go with everything. The potential con is the footbed: it's pretty basic. I often swap in a more supportive insole for all-day comfort. Honestly, the biggest pro for these Air Jordan 1 Lows is their versatility. The 'Panda' colorway goes with literally everything – shorts, jeans, joggers. On-camera, that clean black & white contrast always pops. For $115, it's a wardrobe staple. The downside? That flat, firm footbed isn't for all-day comfort, believe me. Okay, reviewing this retro '85 cut of the "Air Jordan 1 Low". First thing I noticed? The shape is "much" better – closer to the original. It's a premium offering, so it's around $150 USD. On feet, the fit is snugger and more structured than the regular GR lows. Visually, the difference in the silhouette is "everything" for a purist. Pro: superior shape and materials. Con: higher price and a potentially tighter fit. If you're deep into the details of the Jordan series and appreciate accuracy, this version is 100% worth it. Casual buyers might be fine with the standard model. From a style perspective, the Air Jordan 1 Low is arguably "more" wearable than its high-top sibling for many people. This 'Sail' colorway is incredibly versatile. They look fantastic on camera - that low profile is very flattering. The main benefit is the iconic look without the bulk. The potential downside? Some colorways use softer leather that creases noticeably. My take? Embrace the creases. It's a perfect shoe for building a casual wardrobe around.
