My 'Starfish' pair has buttery soft leather—a nice surprise! On feet, they're comfortable right away. The low-cut gives you more ankle mobility than the Highs, for sure. Main advantage is the premium build on some GR releases. Possible issue? Consistency... quality can vary between colorways. At this price point (~$110), they're a great value for a well-made leather sneaker. Best for detail-oriented sneakerheads who appreciate good materials. Got my hands on the 'Dark Powder Blue' Air Jordan 1 Lows. First off, the suede/nubuck combo feels really nice – it elevates them. On-foot comfort is about average; it's more about style than sport here. Visually, they're a cleaner, more subdued take on a Chicago-like theme. Compared to an all-leather pair, these feel a bit more premium. "Plus" is the material quality for the price point (~$120 USD). "Minus" – suede can be a hassle in bad weather. This is a great pair if you appreciate material details and want a low-top that's not too loud. Not the best choice for rainy climates or as a beater shoe. Now, the "not-so-great" part? The comfort tech is... basically "nonexistent". It's a cupsole from the "1980s". If you're on your feet all day, these "aren't" your best bet. Also, the "toe box" creases "super" easily - that's just the nature of the leather. If you're a comfort-first sneakerhead, this might be a dealbreaker. Yo, unboxing this "Shadow" version of the "Air Jordan 1 Low"... man, it's a masterpiece. That grey and black combo is "so" wearable. For a classic color-blocking like this, the $125 USD price feels justified. On feet, they're lightweight and the break-in is minimal. The biggest advantage here is the timeless design – these will look good in 10 years. A potential downside? Some might find the toe box a bit narrow. Honestly, if you're looking for a staple low-top sneaker from the Jordan Brand, this is it. If you have super wide feet, maybe try them on first.
