That's not a bad thing; it means structure. The look is undeniably classic. Compared to newer, techier models, these are about heritage. Big pro: endless outfit combinations. Con: they’re not "running errand all day" comfortable. Ideal for collectors and style-minded people, less so for pure comfort seekers. Who should skip it? Hardcore comfort seekers, as I said. Also, OG purists who only value the exact High-top design might dismiss it. If you're all about that specific High-top collar shape and history, a Mid might feel like a compromise. But – and it's a big but – the "SE" versions often bring enough unique flair to stand on their own merits. So, who is this for? Honestly, it's perfect for the style-focused sneakerhead who values the look over cutting-edge cushioning. It's for someone who wants that iconic Jordan 1 aesthetic — in a Mid SE cut — without the crazy resale price of some Highs. Great first Jordan, great beater pair, great for casual collectors. Comparing it to other Jordans? Well, versus a Jordan 1 High, you lose some of that iconic ankle support and “look.” But you gain easier on-and-off wearability. Versus a Jordan 1 Low, the "Mid SE" offers a bit more structure. It sits in a nice middle ground. If you want the classic vibe without the full commitment of a High, this is your move.
