.. the main difference is obvious: the collar height. The Mid cuts off just above the ankle bone. For me, it actually makes putting them on a bit easier. Some purists will always prefer the High's look, but for lifestyle wear, this Air Jordan 1 Mid is often more practical (and sometimes more affordable). So I'm lacing up this Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Chicago'... man, that color blocking is "iconic". The build is pretty standard for Mids – decent but not amazing. On foot, it's true to size with a secure fit. The insole is thin, so I might swap it. Visually, it's a 10/10 – such a statement piece. Compared to a Dunk High, the AJ1 Mid has more of that "heritage" feel. Great for collectors or just rocking a classic. Not so great if you're on your feet all day. Honestly? For $125, you're paying for the look, not groundbreaking tech. Putting these on, the air jordan 1 mid offers a familiar, secure fit – I went true to size, and it works! The design is timeless; that Black/White combo goes with almost anything. However, let's be real: the footbed isn't the most cushioned. For $125 in the Jordan lineup, you're paying for the iconic look more than advanced tech. I'd recommend it for collectors or fashion-first wearers, but if you need serious support, maybe skip this one. Hey guys — so, I laced up these air jordan 1 mid shoes (in "Shadow" gray, $120 USD) and the fit is spot-on! The padding is minimal, though, so it's more about style than plush comfort. Visually, they look sharp in person — the mid-top height balances well with jeans. Versus other Jordans, it's similar to the Highs but cuts costs. Pros: timeless and durable. Cons: can feel heavy. Recommended for sneaker enthusiasts, not for runners!
