.. the main difference is obvious: the collar height. The Mid cuts off just above the ankle bone. For me, it actually makes putting them on a bit easier. Some purists will always prefer the High's look, but for lifestyle wear, this Air Jordan 1 Mid is often more practical (and sometimes more affordable). Comparing it to my other Jordans, the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" fits right in. The profile is slightly shorter, but from a few feet away? Most people won't even tell the difference. It captures the essence. My final take? For $120-$130 USD, it’s a worthwhile pickup for your rotation — a reliable, iconic shoe that won’t let you down style-wise. On feet today: the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" "Metallic Gold." Look, it's a statement piece. The materials have a nice sheen, and the build quality is on point. Comfort-wise, it's the standard AJ1 experience: firm. After wearing these and then switching to something like a Jordan 3? Big difference in cushioning. The major advantage here is the style-per-dollar ratio. You get an instantly recognizable silhouette. The disadvantage? Lack of modern comfort tech. Ideal for collectors and casual wearers, not for comfort chasers. Who is this NOT for? Listen, if you need arch support or have serious foot issues, the "air jordan 1 mid"'s flat footbed might not be your friend. It's a fashion-first sneaker. Also, if you're a purest for the 1985 details – the OG High is your grail. But for someone wanting that Jordan 1 vibe on a budget, or who finds Highs too tall, this Mid version is a perfect solution.
