On foot, it's comfortable for short trips, yet the arch support is basic. Compared to newer models, it lacks tech. Pros: affordable and versatile. Cons: not for wide feet. Great for everyday use, skip if you need cushioning! Who should maybe skip it? Serious performance basketball players -- this isn't 2024 tech. Also, if you're a die-hard sneakerhead who only values the "original" High OG specs and materials, you might be disappointed. This is the more accessible, mass-friendly version of the icon. And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that for 99% of people. Just got the Air Jordan 1 Mid "Chicago" in, and wow – that color blocking just pops on camera! Unboxing is always a vibe with this classic scheme. On-foot, the fit is snug (I went true to size), and they feel substantial, not super light. Comparing it to the Jordan 1 High? You're really just missing a bit of height around the ankle. The advantage here is often the price and availability. Great sneaker for collectors and casual wearers who want the look without the crazy resell price. Let's talk pros. The biggest advantage is style versatility—this shoe goes with almost anything. The build is durable, and it's often more available (and affordable) than some hyped High-top colorways. For a "$120" price tag, you're getting a piece of sneaker history you can actually wear daily.
