.. the main difference is obvious: the collar height. The Mid cuts off just above the ankle bone. For me, it actually makes putting them on a bit easier. Some purists will always prefer the High's look, but for lifestyle wear, this Air Jordan 1 Mid is often more practical (and sometimes more affordable). Reviewing this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" 'Chicago Black Toe' inspired pair. Opening the box gives you that iconic vibe immediately – the red, black, and white just works. The build feels sturdy; no complaints for the price point. Slipping them on, the ankle collar is stiff initially, but it'll mold to your ankle. Compared to a true OG High 'Chicago,' you're missing some height and history, but the core style is 95% there for less money. The big pro is capturing that legendary look affordably. The trade-off? You might get "it's not the High" comments from sneakerheads. In my view, this is perfect for fans of the Chicago color blocking who want a more accessible and often more available option. Hardcore OG collectors will likely still hold out for the High. Comparing it directly to an AJ1 High? You lose some of that dramatic, high-top look. But you gain easier on-and-off and a slightly more casual vibe. For $120-130 USD, the Mid is often the smarter buy. My final take? The Air Jordan 1 Mid is perfect for sneaker newcomers, or anyone who wants a versatile, iconic shoe without breaking the bank. It's a workhorse. Unboxing this 'Bred Toe' "Air Jordan 1 Mid" – wow, the color blocking is "fire". It immediately channels those OG Chicago/Black Toe vibes. On-foot, the support is notable, especially around the ankle. It's a classic basketball shoe feel, just higher off the ground than you might expect. Pro: Unbeatable style. Con: The ankle padding can feel a bit restrictive if you're not used to it. Definitely a must for AJ1 fans, maybe pass if you prefer low-tops.
