When I walk in them, the support is good, but the break-in period is real. Cameras love this shoe; it always looks sharp. Main advantage? Timeless aesthetics. Downside? The midsole is pretty stiff. Great for style-focused folks, but probably not the best pick for people with wide feet or those needing plush cushioning. Is it perfect? Nah. The main con is the materials can be hit or miss. Some colorways use nicer leather, others use stiffer stuff. This one's okay. Also, if you have wide feet, go up half a size for sure. The break-in period is real. But once they mold to your foot, they're great. It's a classic for a reason, even in its Mid form. Comparing it to other Jordans? The Mid sits, well, in the middle. It’s more affordable than most Highs (this pair is $115), and it’s got more presence than a Low for me. The build quality on this specific ‘Mid’ is good—no major glue stains or anything. A clear advantage is the classic look without the classic High-top price hike, which is a huge pro for a lot of sneakerheads on a budget. Comparing it to my other Jordans… The "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is noticeably lighter than an AJ1 High, and "way" less bulky than something like a Jordan 4. The simplicity is its strength. The break-in period was minimal for me—maybe one full day of wear. However, that also means less padding. It’s a trade-off. I’d recommend these for a sneaker rotation, not as your only, all-purpose shoe. Perfect for casual hangs, not for long walks.
