.. the main difference is obvious: the collar height. The Mid cuts off just above the ankle bone. For me, it actually makes putting them on a bit easier. Some purists will always prefer the High's look, but for lifestyle wear, this Air Jordan 1 Mid is often more practical (and sometimes more affordable). Who should maybe skip it? Serious performance basketball players -- this isn't 2024 tech. Also, if you're a die-hard sneakerhead who only values the "original" High OG specs and materials, you might be disappointed. This is the more accessible, mass-friendly version of the icon. And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that for 99% of people. Unboxing this Air Jordan 1 Mid SE with the different materials... interesting! The suede/nubuck combo feels nice. First wear? The break-in is real, guys – give it a few wears. It's a bit clunky, but that's part of the charm. On foot, the Mid profile is actually more flattering for shorter fits than the High, IMO. Major pro: timeless design that goes with everything. Potential con: the ankle padding can feel rough at first. I'd say this is perfect for a style-focused wardrobe staple. Performance basketball players? Look at newer models. Final verdict? For me, this is an easy recommendation for a specific person. If you want a durable, versatile, and historically significant sneaker to beat up, the "air jordan 1 mid" is a stellar choice. It's a workhorse in a classic silhouette. Just manage your comfort expectations.
