The leather quality? It's decent for the $115 price point – you get that classic, clean silhouette instantly. Putting them on, the fit is true to size with a snug, secure wrap around the ankle. Compared to the OG Highs, you're losing a little height, but for daily wear? It's a more casual, accessible look. The major pro is the timeless style; it goes with literally everything. The con? The cushioning is firm – don't expect Boost-like comfort. My take? If you want a versatile, iconic sneaker without the high-top commitment or the high price, this Mid is perfect. If you need plush comfort for all-day wear, maybe look elsewhere. So I'm lacing up this Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Chicago'... man, that color blocking is "iconic". The build is pretty standard for Mids – decent but not amazing. On foot, it's true to size with a secure fit. The insole is thin, so I might swap it. Visually, it's a 10/10 – such a statement piece. Compared to a Dunk High, the AJ1 Mid has more of that "heritage" feel. Great for collectors or just rocking a classic. Not so great if you're on your feet all day. Honestly? For $125, you're paying for the look, not groundbreaking tech. How do they look on camera / in person? Honestly, the metallic finish pops "really" well under good lighting. It's a versatile color-blocking. Compared to some other "Jordan" releases, this "Mid" is much easier to get and style. A major "pro" is its wardrobe flexibility - jeans, shorts, it works with everything. On foot, the air jordan 1 mid — this "Black Toe" colorway ($120 USD) — looks even better in motion! The silhouette is iconic, and on camera, the contrast really stands out. However, the insole isn't the most cushioned, so if you're used to modern sneakers, it might feel a bit basic. Personally, I love it for its versatility. A solid pick for sneakerheads, but maybe not for performance athletes.
