.. the main difference is obvious: the collar height. The Mid cuts off just above the ankle bone. For me, it actually makes putting them on a bit easier. Some purists will always prefer the High's look, but for lifestyle wear, this Air Jordan 1 Mid is often more practical (and sometimes more affordable). So, here's my take on this Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Ghost Green.' Unique color, for sure. The materials are standard, but the construction is neat. On feet, they're true to size with a break-in period for the ankle area. The biggest advantage of any Mid is the price and accessibility. The drawback? It doesn't have the same "hype" or legacy status as some Highs. But if you love the design and want to rock it daily, this is a no-brainer. Let's get into these! This Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Royal' just arrived. The blue leather looks sharp in hand. Slipping them on... immediate feedback: they're supportive, but "man" that forefoot is stiff. The weight is noticeable – it's a substantial shoe. In natural light, the colors really shine. Compared to a Jordan 1 Low, the Mid offers more ankle... "presence". Love it for the classic aesthetic and versatility. Don't love it for long-distance walking. Verdict? A solid pick for casual wear, but know what you're signing up for: style over supreme comfort. Peeling back the tissue paper on this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" 'Court Purple' – the colors are vibrant and the leather has a nice grain. It's a statement piece. On foot, the ankle support is there, but the cushioning is minimal. If you're coming from a Yeezy or a New Balance, it's a stark difference. Pro: You get a piece of sneaker history. Con: Not the most practical for long-term wear. Best for collectors and style mavens.
