.. the main difference is obvious: the collar height. The Mid cuts off just above the ankle bone. For me, it actually makes putting them on a bit easier. Some purists will always prefer the High's look, but for lifestyle wear, this Air Jordan 1 Mid is often more practical (and sometimes more affordable). The color-blocking on this particular Air Jordan 1 Mid is what sold me. In hand, the materials are okay, but on foot? Man, they just pop. I love how versatile this silhouette is – it literally goes with anything. Compared to some of the recent High releases, the Mid is often more accessible and affordable. It's a fantastic entry point into the Jordan series without breaking the bank. Just got this Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Light Smoke Grey' in hand. Initial thoughts? The materials feel a step up – nice tumbled leather! The grey & white is super wearable. Putting them on... the ankle collar is stiff "initially", but the midfoot lockdown is good. Compared to my Dunks, the AJ1 Mid feels more structured. I love the classic basketball profile on foot. Downside? The outsole is a bit slippery on smooth surfaces. At around $120, it's a great entry into the Jordan series. But if you have wide feet? "Proceed with caution." Opening this "Chicago"-inspired "Air Jordan 1 Mid", the colors really pop. The build feels sturdy, a good mix of leather and synthetic. Slipping them on, the ankle collar is definitely lower than the OG Highs – more mobility, but less support. Aesthetically, this shoe kills it with jeans or shorts. The major pro? It’s instantly recognizable as a "Jordan series" icon. The con? That classic, unforgiving break-in period. Worth it for style purists, not for comfort seekers.
