.. the main difference is obvious: the collar height. The Mid cuts off just above the ankle bone. For me, it actually makes putting them on a bit easier. Some purists will always prefer the High's look, but for lifestyle wear, this Air Jordan 1 Mid is often more practical (and sometimes more affordable). So I'm lacing up this Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Chicago'... man, that color blocking is "iconic". The build is pretty standard for Mids – decent but not amazing. On foot, it's true to size with a secure fit. The insole is thin, so I might swap it. Visually, it's a 10/10 – such a statement piece. Compared to a Dunk High, the AJ1 Mid has more of that "heritage" feel. Great for collectors or just rocking a classic. Not so great if you're on your feet all day. Honestly? For $125, you're paying for the look, not groundbreaking tech. Final verdict? I’m keeping these. For the price, the style, and the versatility, the "air jordan 1 mid" is a win in my book. It’s a piece of sneaker history you can actually wear regularly without too much stress. It’s not the most exciting release, but it’s a reliable, classic option. If you like the colorway and the silhouette, you really can’t go wrong. Comparing it directly to other Jordans? The "air jordan 1 mid" sits right between the iconic High and the more casual Low. You lose some of the classic High-top drama, but you gain everyday versatility. The cushioning is the same familiar setup: not super plush, but reliable. It's a great gateway into the Jordan series if Highs feel like too much.
