.. the main difference is obvious: the collar height. The Mid cuts off just above the ankle bone. For me, it actually makes putting them on a bit easier. Some purists will always prefer the High's look, but for lifestyle wear, this Air Jordan 1 Mid is often more practical (and sometimes more affordable). On feet, this 'Chicago' "Air Jordan 1 Mid" looks amazing. The red really pops! Compared to the OG High version, the "Mid" lacks some of that top-tier ankle support, but honestly? For casual wear, it’s totally fine. A huge pro is the easier on-and-off. A con? That break-in period can be a bit stiff. Unboxing this pair, the air jordan 1 mid's construction feels sturdy – good stitching and a firm shape. Wearing them, the ankle collar is comfortable, but the sole is firm, no doubt. In terms of style, it holds up well against other Jordans; the Mid is a bit more low-key than the Highs. Pros: iconic design and easy to style. Cons: not the most breathable shoe. Priced at $125 USD, it's a solid choice for casual wear, but not for athletic use. Who is this NOT for? Listen, if you need arch support or have serious foot issues, the "air jordan 1 mid"'s flat footbed might not be your friend. It's a fashion-first sneaker. Also, if you're a purest for the 1985 details – the OG High is your grail. But for someone wanting that Jordan 1 vibe on a budget, or who finds Highs too tall, this Mid version is a perfect solution.
