My feet were a bit tired, though – no sugarcoating it. The ankle support is great, but the footbed is basic. It's a shoe you wear "for the shoe itself", not for an invisible comfort experience. And you know what? That's perfectly okay for what it is. Comparing it to modern Jordans like the Jordan 5 or 13? The Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG is "all" about style, not performance tech. You buy this for the heritage and the crisp look. The materials on this 'Court Purple' version are decent—better than some GR releases. For $180 USD, you're getting a piece of sneaker history that still dominates streetwear. What's up, everyone? Just unboxed the "'Dark Mocha' Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG". First impression? The brown and black suede/nubuck combo looks "even better" in hand. It's a super versatile colorway. On feet, it’s the same story: great ankle support, but a firm ride. I’d say it’s more of a "style" shoe than a "comfort" shoe. At its "$170 USD" retail, it was a must-cop. It’s a fantastic alternative to the super-expensive Travis Scott collab. Not for you if you need cloud-like comfort, but a top-tier option for your rotation. Opening the box, the silhouette of the "Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG" is just "chef's kiss". This 'Bordeaux' colorway has such rich, deep tones. On foot, the high-top provides great lockdown, which I love. Compared to a Dunk High, the AJ1 has a narrower profile and often better materials. Is it worth the retail price? For this quality and iconic status in the Jordan series, I say yes. Just don't expect a revolution in foot comfort.
