The height matters! It offers more ankle coverage and, subjectively, looks more "complete." Is it worth the higher price than a Mid? For the purists and for that specific silhouette, yes. But the Lows are fantastic for summer and offer a similar vibe with less bulk. Just my two cents! Opening the box on this 'Midnight Navy' Air Jordan 1 Retro High. First thing I notice is that rich, deep blue leather — it looks premium. At $170 USD, it's in the standard Retro High price range. My initial wear impression? The toe box is roomier than some older retros, which is a plus. The silhouette is just so photogenic, honestly. Pro? Unbeatable, timeless design that elevates any simple outfit. Con? The lack of real cushioning is very noticeable. I'd recommend this to anyone building a sneaker rotation who values style over cloud-like comfort. After wearing these 'Bred' colorways for a few hours, I gotta say—they do soften up a bit. The $180 USD price tag stings, but you're paying for the icon. The lockdown is excellent, and that confidence you feel wearing a classic? Priceless. Just don't expect a revolution in foot feel. It’s the same legendary shoe, and for better or worse, that’s the point. Now, the cons. The main one is the comfort, or lack of "modern" comfort. The footbed is firm. If you're on your feet all day, these aren't your go-to. Also, the leather can crease noticeably – some love that, some hate it. The 'Air Jordan 1 Retro High' is a lifestyle shoe first, performance second.
