Air jordan 1 retro : Comparing these to, say, a "Jordan 1 Mid" – the "Retro" high-top just feels more substantial and "correct" to me [7oos5kcl]

The leather on these 'Court Purples' has a nicer grain. Is it worth the extra cash over a Mid? For a purist, probably yes. But if you're just dipping your toes into the "Jordan" series, a Mid is a fantastic and more affordable starting point. Just my two cents! Final thoughts? After wearing these "air jordan 1 retro" highs all day... my feet are reminding me they're a 1985 design. The look is unbeatable – they elevate any simple outfit. The packaging and presentation from the Jordan series always feel special. But the "experience" is more about style than sensation. Worth it? For a collector or a fashion fan, yes. For someone seeking modern footwear tech, no. It's a legacy piece, and you have to judge it on those terms. Alright, so here are the Air Jordan 1 Retro 'Chicago'... and man, the box feels iconic. First thing I noticed? The leather quality is... "solid", but not crazy premium - which is pretty standard for a 1 Retro. That shape, though? It's perfect. For $180 USD, you're really paying for that classic, timeless look that started the whole Jordan series. On foot, they're stiff - no surprise there - but the ankle support is fantastic. Walking in them... you notice the weight. They have a substantial feel, not heavy but "present". The collar digs in a bit at first - that's normal for AJ1s, they need a short break-in. Compared to a dunk? Similar vibe, but the "Air Jordan 1 Retro" has more structure, more "authority" on foot, in my opinion.

• Shown: Infrared
• Style: CT8529-003