The 4s have that air unit; these are much firmer. But for pure style points and that timeless basketball aesthetic, the "Air Jordan 1 Retro" still wins for me. It's the foundation of the entire "Jordan series". You can't go wrong having one in your collection. Comparing these to, say, a "Jordan 1 Mid" – the "Retro" high-top just feels more substantial and "correct" to me. The leather on these 'Court Purples' has a nicer grain. Is it worth the extra cash over a Mid? For a purist, probably yes. But if you're just dipping your toes into the "Jordan" series, a Mid is a fantastic and more affordable starting point. Just my two cents! After wearing these Air Jordan 1 Retros all day, here's my verdict. The ankle collar provides great support, but the forefoot is pretty unforgiving on long walks. Visually, they just look "right" with jeans or shorts. It's a timeless flex. Worth the $180? For a classic colorway, yes. For a GR (General Release) in a so-so color? Maybe wait for a sale. Know what you're buying into. Finally, the ‘Mid’ version in the ‘Elephant Print’ colorway. Priced around $135, it’s the most affordable option here. First impression? The print is wild and the build is… okay. It’s a Mid, so the cut is slightly different—a bit shorter. On foot, comfort is similar to the High, maybe a tiny bit less restrictive. Pro: Fun design and a lower price point. Con: Purists often dismiss Mids due to materials and design tweaks. I’d recommend this to a younger crowd or those on a budget wanting the AJ1 look. Hardcore OG fans will likely steer clear.
