The materials are a step up. However, the "Jordan 1 Low" might be more "broken-in" from the first wear. The "Air Jordan 11 Retro Low" has that stiffer patent leather that needs a short "break-in". It’s a trade-off for that "glossy", premium aesthetic. Who should maybe skip it? Hardcore ballers looking for current on-court tech. Also, if you need maximum arch support or have "very" wide feet, definitely try before you buy. This isn't a hyper-functional modern trainer; it's a style icon first. Who should maybe skip? If you need extreme, cloud-like comfort for long hours on your feet, look at other options. Also, if you strongly prefer the high-top look and ankle support of the original AJ11, then the Air Jordan 11 Retro Low version might feel like a compromise to you. Putting these on, the comfort is... familiar. It's not ultra-plush like some modern shoes, but it's a good, balanced feel. The low-cut design gives you more ankle mobility, obviously. Compared to the high-top 'Air Jordan 11', this low version is way more of a casual, everyday shoe in my opinion. A definite advantage for warmer weather or just a cleaner look with shorts.
