You lose some of the High's "legendary" ankle coverage & styling options, but you gain a bit more everyday flexibility. Versus a modern Jordan like the 36? It's a completely different world — this is about heritage, not performance tech. For $135 USD, it's a style piece. On feet, the silhouette is just timeless. This Mid cut sits perfectly between a low and a high-top. I love how it looks with jeans or shorts. Comparing it to the OG High, you lose a bit of that classic profile, but you gain some everyday versatility — and often, a lower price point. For a daily driver in the Jordan series, this is a strong contender. Let's talk pros & cons. Pros first: The style is undeniable – it's a classic. Price is relatively accessible for a "Jordan" series shoe. It's durable for daily beaters. A major con? The comfort, or lack thereof. The insole is basic, and that Air unit? You barely feel it. Don't buy these for performance or all-day walking comfort. Just unboxed the "Air Jordan Mid 1" ‘Starfish’ – that orange is "crazy" bright. Initial impression is strong; the paint and stitching are clean. Wearing them, the fit is standard and comfortable for a lifestyle shoe. On foot, they demand attention – in a good way. Versus a neutral Jordan, this is for making a statement. The advantage is bold style at a relatively accessible price point (~$125). The trade-off? That bold color might limit your outfit choices. My final thought: This is for the style risk-taker who loves color. If you prefer a "one-shoe-matches-everything" approach, a more neutral "Mid" might be a better fit for your collection.
