For some, that's a plus for mobility and a cleaner look. For pure, classic basketball aesthetic, the High wins. But for daily versatility? The Mid 1 holds its own, no doubt. My final take? I like them. For the price, you can't go wrong with a clean colorway. This "University Blue" "Air Jordan Mid 1" is fire. They're durable, they look great, and they're part of sneaker history. Would I recommend them? Yes, but with caveats. Don't expect cloud-like comfort. Do expect compliments and a versatile shoe for your rotation. It's a workhorse in the "Jordan series". For "$125 USD", it's a sensible, stylish pickup. Just break them in slowly! Comparing it directly to the Air Jordan 1 High? The main difference is, of course, the collar height. The "air jordan mid 1" gives you slightly more ankle freedom, which I actually prefer for all-day wear. However, some purists might miss the complete, iconic High top look. For $125, it's a more accessible entry point into the Jordan 1 lineage, which is a big plus. On feet now, and let's talk feel. The "air jordan mid 1" is a retro basketball shoe, so don't expect modern, plush cushioning. It's firm. The ankle support from the mid-top cut is noticeable and good for casual wear. The toe box has room, which I prefer. It's not a heavy shoe, but you feel its presence. If you're used to ultra-boosts or React, this will be a different, more grounded experience.
