Also, if you're a purest for the original '85 High OG shape and details, the Mid’s proportions might feel off. And if you already have multiple similar colorways in the Jordan series, this might be a pass. It’s a fantastic shoe, but it doesn’t reinvent the wheel. Now, a potential "con": the comfort tech is dated. If you're coming from modern sneakers with Zoom or Boost, the firm ride of the "air jordan mid 1" will be noticeable. It breaks in, but don't expect plushness. Also, the Mid cut can feel a bit "in-between" for some—not as supportive as a High, not as minimal as a Low. Something to consider. Straight up, the biggest "pro" here is the accessibility. You can actually find and buy these. The "Air Jordan Mid 1" sits at a great price point, around "$125 USD". The design is nearly identical to the High from afar. The "con"? Some sneakerheads will always see it as the "little brother" to the High OG. But honestly? That's their loss. This shoe stands on its own. The mid-top height is practical and stylish. If you want the look without the hype or resell price, this is your answer. Alright, so first impressions unboxing this "air jordan mid 1" 'Chicago'... the color-blocking is just iconic, right? The red, black, and white combo pops instantly. Checking the build quality on this pair - for the $135 price point - the leather feels decent, not the super buttery stuff, but it's clean. The shape and silhouette are exactly what you expect from the "Jordan" lineage. A solid, classic start.
