It's for the style-conscious person who appreciates heritage. It's "not" for the performance athlete or the comfort-first wearer. At "$125 USD", it's a fair deal for an icon. You're buying into the legacy. Would I choose it over a High if both were retail? Probably not. But for availability and value, the Mid wins. It's a cornerstone shoe. What do you think? Let me know in the comments below Who are these for? Honestly, perfect for someone entering the sneaker game or wanting a reliable, iconic sneaker. The Mid 1 is less hype than some Retros, easier to get, and often under $150. If you need a shoe that goes with everything and has that Jordan heritage? This is it. It's a no-brainer first Jordan for many. Conversely, who should maybe skip it? Hardcore performance basketball players—this isn't a modern hoop shoe. Also, comfort seekers beware! If you prioritize cushioning above all else, the Air Jordan Mid 1 platform might disappoint you. It's a lifestyle silhouette first. Don't buy it expecting a revolution in foot feel, because you won't get it. Now, the not-so-great part. The break-in period can be "real"—the heel and pinky toe area might rub for the first few wears. Also, that classic Jordan 1 outsole traction? It can get "slippery" on wet surfaces, so maybe not your go-to rain shoe. Just keeping it 100% with you guys.