For some, that's a plus for mobility and a cleaner look. For pure, classic basketball aesthetic, the High wins. But for daily versatility? The Mid 1 holds its own, no doubt. Is it worth the $135? For the style, heritage, and versatility – I'd say yes. You're paying for the design and the legacy. The "Air Jordan Mid 1" isn't trying to be a tech marvel; it's a style icon. And for that purpose, it delivers exactly what it promises. On-feet aesthetic? "Fantastic". The Mid 1 has this "perfect" height that "doesn't" cut your leg off like a High sometimes can. This "Shadow" grey colorway is "especially" versatile. The "downside", again, is material "quality"—it can crease "pretty" easily. But "honestly", for the price point in the Jordan lineup, it's a "fair" compromise for such a clean, wearable silhouette. Sliding these Air Jordan Mid 1s on... the fit is TTS (true to size) for me. Immediate thoughts? The ankle collar provides nice support — more than a Low, less than a High. The cushioning is... well, it's an '85-inspired shoe, so don't expect Boost-level softness. It's firm but comfortable for all-day wear. The "overall" feel is classic, stable, & just "simple".
