It's for the style-conscious person who appreciates heritage. It's "not" for the performance athlete or the comfort-first wearer. At "$125 USD", it's a fair deal for an icon. You're buying into the legacy. Would I choose it over a High if both were retail? Probably not. But for availability and value, the Mid wins. It's a cornerstone shoe. What do you think? Let me know in the comments below Yo, for this Chicago-inspired Air Jordan Mid 1, the red hits just pop. Unboxing feels nostalgic every time. The toe box has that nice shape. Wearing them, they feel secure—the Mid cut is a sweet spot for me. Visually, they look fantastic on camera, that classic profile always works. Downside? The leather can crease pretty quickly. Worth it? If you love the Jordan 1 legacy but want a slightly different silhouette, absolutely. Not for comfort-first seekers, though. Alright, let's get into these Air Jordan Mid 1s. First "impression"? The shape on this specific colorway is actually pretty solid straight out of the box. The materials feel "standard" for the price point—nothing "luxe", but the stitching is clean. That classic Jordan 1 silhouette is just "undeniable", you know? It's the Mid cut, so it sits "right" between the High and the Low. For around $135 USD, it's a "decent" starting point into the Jordan series if you're new. Comparing these to other Jordans? The Air Jordan Mid 1 sits perfectly between the High & the Low. You lose some of the High's "legendary" ankle coverage & styling options, but you gain a bit more everyday flexibility. Versus a modern Jordan like the 36? It's a completely different world — this is about heritage, not performance tech. For $135 USD, it's a style piece.
