Also, if you're a purest for the OG High-top silhouette, the Mid's shorter collar might bug you. But if you appreciate the design language of the Jordan 1 and want a practical version? The Air Jordan Mid 1 is a fantastic option. Comparing it directly to the AJ1 High? The "air jordan mid 1" obviously has one less lace hole, so the ankle feel is different—a bit more free. Some purists will always prefer the High, and I get that! But for casual, all-day comfort and easier on/off, I actually prefer the Mid. It's a personal thing, really. How do they look on camera? Honestly, the Mid cut is super versatile. Sometimes Highs can look a bit bulky, but the "Air Jordan Mid 1" sits just right. This "Neutral Grey" pair I'm wearing is "clean". It works with jeans, joggers—you name it. The design is timeless; it’s why this model stays relevant. Compared to a Dunk, the toe box is slightly roomier, which I prefer. A definite "pro" is its effortless style. A "con"? The flat, non-supportive insole might not be for everyone with foot issues. On foot, visually, this shoe just "works". The Mid cut is fantastic – it gives you that iconic AJ1 profile without being as high as the OG Highs. For everyday wear, this is a huge "pro". They're easier to style with different pants, and honestly, for a lot of people, the "Air Jordan Mid 1" is just a more practical, wearable option.
