It uses a mix of leather and synthetic—it's fine for the cost. On foot, they feel lighter than they look! The ankle padding is sufficient. The design is just "chef's kiss"—it's why the Jordan 1 Mid remains popular. Honestly, the biggest advantage over the High is often availability and price. Not a performance shoe by any means. Perfect for casual wear, not for balling or long-distance walks. Let's talk looks on-camera. I have to say, the Mid cut is a sleeker profile compared to the Highs. This particular "Gym Red" color pops really well! The Air Jordan Mid 1 sits nicely on the foot, giving you a clean, classic sneaker look that works with jeans or shorts. For content creators, it's a photogenic shoe—that side profile is just iconic. It doesn't scream for attention, but sneakerheads will definitely notice. Here's a potential con, though: purists might argue it's not the "OG" High cut. And you know what? They're right. But not everyone needs or wants that. If you're a stickler for the original 1985 specs, this isn't it. But for a stylish, wearable sneaker? It absolutely gets the job done. Wearing these around, I appreciate the "Mid" cut more and more. It offers that classic "Jordan 1" profile but is easier to get on and off than the Highs. There's a certain nostalgia factor with the "Air Jordan Mid 1" that modern retros sometimes lack. It feels authentic, like a direct link to the court styles of the past.
