It uses a mix of leather and synthetic—it's fine for the cost. On foot, they feel lighter than they look! The ankle padding is sufficient. The design is just "chef's kiss"—it's why the Jordan 1 Mid remains popular. Honestly, the biggest advantage over the High is often availability and price. Not a performance shoe by any means. Perfect for casual wear, not for balling or long-distance walks. Comparing it to other models – if you own an AJ1 High, the "air jordan mid 1" feels... slightly less iconic, but also less bulky around the ankle. It's a more casual, accessible vibe. Versus a Low? The Mid offers more ankle structure. For the price point? It's a compelling option in the "Jordan" lineup, bridging that gap between Highs and Lows perfectly. In summary: Pro - timeless style & everyday versatility. Con - basic, old-school cushioning. At the end of the day, the Air Jordan Mid 1 is a foundational sneaker. It won't blow your mind with tech, but it "will" consistently look good on your feet. That's my genuine take! On feet now. The fit is true to size for me. The padding around the ankle on the Mid is noticeable—it's comfortable and gives good support for casual wear. The footbed isn't plush by any means, but it's not uncomfortable either. It's that classic, flat feel. If you're used to modern, cushioned sneakers, the Air Jordan 1 Mid might feel a bit firm at first.
