Honestly, the materials – especially the smooth black leather – look cleaner than I expected for this tier. On foot, the break-in is minimal (which is a plus), and that ankle collar gives good support. It's a timeless, easy-to-match look. Versus a High? You lose some of that dramatic height, but gain easier wearability. Major advantage is the classic Jordan aesthetic at a more accessible price point (~$125). Downside? It's a flat-footed experience – no tech story here. I'd recommend it for beginners in the "Jordan series" or daily beaters. Hardcore comfort seekers, look elsewhere. Who might want to skip? If you're a hardcore OG silhouette collector "only" chasing Highs, this isn't it. If you need plush, modern cushioning for long walks, consider something with more tech. And if you dislike obvious creasing on the toe box, maybe look at a different material. Just my two cents! On foot now, and honestly, the comfort is what I expected—which is "not" super plush. It's a classic basketball shoe from the 80s, folks! The Air Jordan Mid 1 provides good ankle support and a secure fit for me, but it's not a modern "all-day" comfort shoe. Break-in is definitely required. The weight is fine, nothing crazy. It's more about style and that heritage feel than cloud-like cushioning. Who should maybe skip it? Serious ballers looking for modern performance tech – look at newer models. Also, if you have very wide feet, the fit can be snug. And if you "only" want the highest OG form, you'll likely stick to the Highs. But for most? This Mid is a great choice.
