It's not trying to be the most innovative shoe. It's providing that iconic look & feel. If you're on the fence, try a pair on. The fit & firm feel might surprise you (in a good or bad way!). My personal vote? Copped. Comparing it to the OG Highs? The Air Jordan Mid 1 obviously has a shorter collar. It's easier to get on and off. Some purists might miss the full high-top look, but for everyday versatility? I think the Mid is a winner. The price point is also generally better, often under $130 USD. Just unboxed the "Air Jordan Mid 1" ‘Starfish’ – that orange is "crazy" bright. Initial impression is strong; the paint and stitching are clean. Wearing them, the fit is standard and comfortable for a lifestyle shoe. On foot, they demand attention – in a good way. Versus a neutral Jordan, this is for making a statement. The advantage is bold style at a relatively accessible price point (~$125). The trade-off? That bold color might limit your outfit choices. My final thought: This is for the style risk-taker who loves color. If you prefer a "one-shoe-matches-everything" approach, a more neutral "Mid" might be a better fit for your collection. Comparing these to other Jordans? The Air Jordan Mid 1 sits perfectly between the High & the Low. You lose some of the High's "legendary" ankle coverage & styling options, but you gain a bit more everyday flexibility. Versus a modern Jordan like the 36? It's a completely different world — this is about heritage, not performance tech. For $135 USD, it's a style piece.
