.. it's fine. "Seriously", just "fine". The "lack" of modern cushioning is "apparent". However, the "support" and "lockdown" are good once broken in. It's a "trade-off": you get that legendary look for a "reasonable" $135, but you sacrifice "plush" feel. Perfect for "light" wear, not for all-day "standing". Here's a detailed look at this 'Dark Concord' Air Jordan Mid. That purple is deeper in person—really unique. Construction is standard Jordan Mid quality. My true size fit perfectly, no pinching. The footbed is firm, offering decent arch support for a flat shoe. Compared to a Dunk, it feels more structured. Pro: Incredibly easy to style with jeans or shorts. Con: The price has crept up to $135 on some colorways. I'd recommend these to a sneaker fan wanting a durable, iconic shoe. Yo, for this Chicago-inspired Air Jordan Mid 1, the red hits just pop. Unboxing feels nostalgic every time. The toe box has that nice shape. Wearing them, they feel secure—the Mid cut is a sweet spot for me. Visually, they look fantastic on camera, that classic profile always works. Downside? The leather can crease pretty quickly. Worth it? If you love the Jordan 1 legacy but want a slightly different silhouette, absolutely. Not for comfort-first seekers, though. How do they look on camera? Honestly, the Mid cut is super versatile. Sometimes Highs can look a bit bulky, but the "Air Jordan Mid 1" sits just right. This "Neutral Grey" pair I'm wearing is "clean". It works with jeans, joggers—you name it. The design is timeless; it’s why this model stays relevant. Compared to a Dunk, the toe box is slightly roomier, which I prefer. A definite "pro" is its effortless style. A "con"? The flat, non-supportive insole might not be for everyone with foot issues.
