It's just the nature of the material. Also, the traction on super-dusty floors can be a bit iffy. These aren't for balling in, obviously. And at $225+, it's a significant investment for a primarily lifestyle shoe. You're paying for the heritage, not cutting-edge tech. On-camera, this shoe looks even better. The proportions of the "air jordan retro 11" are just perfect. In terms of comfort, it’s good — not great. The cushioning is adequate for all-day wear, but it's firm. Compared to a Retro 1? Much better tech. Compared to a modern performance shoe? It's vintage. Major pro: unparalleled style. Possible con: the price ($225 USD) for tech that’s decades old. I’d say it’s for the style-conscious collector, not the comfort-first wearer. On foot, the look is everything. That shiny patent leather catches the light perfectly on camera. It’s a shoe that elevates a simple outfit. However, the full-length Air-Sole unit – while decent – isn't "plush" by today's standards. If you're used to modern, super-soft cushioning, this might feel a bit firm. It's more about style & heritage here. Comparing it to another popular model, like the "Air Jordan 1", the Retro 11 offers a more "complete" feel around the ankle. The 1 is more minimalist. For casual ball or all-day wear, I'd give the edge to the 11 for comfort. The carbon fiber shank plate also provides nice stability / that the 1 lacks. Different tools for different jobs!
