The speckled details & aged midsole? "Chef's kiss". This is a grail for a reason. On feet, they feel "substantial"—you know you're wearing them. The toe box has good room. Compared to a Retro 3, I find the 4's upper more supportive. Love the heritage look. Downside? That shiny plastic wing tab can crease "easily". For a ~$220 Jordan series release, it's a legend. If you beat your kicks up hard, maybe think twice. Is it worth the $210 USD? For me, yes - especially for a classic colorway like 'Bred' or 'Cement'. You're buying a piece of history that still looks incredible today. The materials are generally good for a retro, and the construction is durable. Just go in with the right expectations: you're getting a firm, supportive, and iconic sneaker, not a cloud for your feet. On foot, the design "really" pops. The mesh panels and plastic wing eyelets add so much texture. Compared to a sleeker Jordan 3 or a bulkier 5, the Retro 4 has this perfect, aggressive balance. It works with "so many" fits—from joggers to denim. This 'Military Blue' version? A clean, versatile summer sneaker for sure. Major pro: its style versatility. On feet now. Honestly, the "air jordan retro 4" feels... familiar. It's not super plush like modern performance shoes. The cushioning is firm, but in a way that feels stable. The lockdown from those plastic wing eyelets is "excellent" - my foot feels secure. If you want a cloud-like feel, look elsewhere. But for that classic '89 basketball shoe experience? It delivers.
