First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Final verdict? For me, it's a yes. The Jordan 1 High OG 'Chicago' is worth it. It's a cornerstone. The look, the history, the sheer versatility… it's unmatched. Just go in knowing the comfort is classic, not modern. As an all-time-great design? 10/10. Not everyone will vibe with it, though. If your priority is cutting-edge comfort or max cushioning for all-day wear, look elsewhere. This isn't that shoe. Also, for some, the $190+ price for a "basic" leather shoe might feel steep. You're paying for the icon status. So, think about what you "really" want from a sneaker before copping this Jordan Air 1. Here's the deal with the "Obsidian" Jordan Air 1. Unboxing felt special – the color blocking is just clean. On feet, the fit is perfect for me. They're not heavy at all, which I appreciate. Walking around, the leather starts to soften up a bit. Compared to some bulkier Jordans, this feels sleek and classic. The biggest pro is the easy styling. A potential con? The toe box might feel narrow for some. If you have wider feet, maybe try a half-size up. For most people looking for a stylish, everyday Jordan, this $170 investment is totally worth it.
