On foot, they're comfortable enough for all-day wear, though the cushioning is definitely on the firmer side. Comparing it to a newer model, like a Jordan 5? The Air 1 is way lighter and more flexible. The major pro is its versatility; it goes with literally anything. But if you're looking for modern, plush comfort, this isn't it. For style purists? 100% cop. For comfort chasers? Maybe look elsewhere. Walking around in them... yeah, you feel every bit of that 1985 DNA. The sole is firm, the ankle support is high – it's a very "grounded" feel. I love the elevated look it gives me, style-wise. But compared to a Jordan 3 or 4? It's less forgiving on the foot, for sure. That's the trade-off for that sleek, low-profile silhouette. If you prioritize looks – win. If you prioritize plush comfort – maybe look elsewhere. Final verdict? For me, it's a yes. The Jordan 1 High OG 'Chicago' is worth it. It's a cornerstone. The look, the history, the sheer versatility… it's unmatched. Just go in knowing the comfort is classic, not modern. As an all-time-great design? 10/10. What's up, everyone? Just unboxed the Jordan Air 1 Mid in this 'Black/Gym Red' version. Honestly? The materials feel a step down from some OG Highs, but for $135 USD, you get that iconic look. Sliding them on, the fit is true to size with good ankle "support!" Compared to a Jordan 3 or 4, the Air 1 is much lighter and less bulky. Major advantage? Pure style and street cred. The disadvantage? That flat, basic footbed -seriously-, don't expect cloud-like comfort. I'd recommend these for casual wear and collectors. Not for long days on your feet or performance ball.
