Price has crept up, but it's still an accessible icon. The main advantage is its timelessness – a 2024 release looks just as relevant as an '85 original. That's rare in sneakers. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Sliding these on... you gotta remember the Jordan Air 1 is a 1985 design. The tech is basically zero. It’s a firm, flat ride—don’t expect cloud-like comfort. But, the ankle support and that snug, true-to-size fit are actually great for all-day wear. It’s more about style and heritage, not performance cushioning, which is totally fine for its purpose. Let's talk about the "fit" of the Jordan Air 1. I went true-to-size, and the length is perfect. The width is "snug", not tight. For some with wider feet, this could be an issue—consider sizing up half. The ankle support is fantastic for a lifestyle shoe. Stepping out, you feel "connected" to the ground. It's not a squishy, modern sneaker. You buy the Jordan Air 1 for its legendary look and cultural weight, period. It's a wardrobe essential, not a comfort innovator.
