The color story here is "beautiful" – soft purples and greys. The craftsmanship on recent women's releases has been "on point". On foot, it fits "true-to-size" (I went with my usual men's conversion). The "advantage" is getting a unique colorway that stands out. A "possible drawback"? Limited size runs can be frustrating. If you find your size, it's a "wonderful" way to add a subtle pop of color to your rotation. It might not appeal to someone looking for a "bold", OG color-blocking. Priced around "$180", it feels fair for the quality. Here's the classic 'Bred' Jordan Air 1. Unboxing it never gets old—that black/red combo is just powerful. The shape looks great this year. On foot, it's the same story: iconic look, average comfort. The ankle collar provides good support, but the midsole is hard. Side-by-side with a Dunk, the Air 1 has more structure. The biggest pro is its status in history—it's a must-have. The con? It's not a comfortable sneaker by today's standards. For ~$170 USD, you're buying a piece of culture. Perfect for your collection. Not ideal if you want a "walk-all-day" shoe. Just copped this newer Jordan Air 1 'Mid' version in 'Wolf Grey'. At a lower price point (~$115), expectations are different. The materials are more synthetic, but the shape is still there! On foot, they feel... fine. It's a budget-friendly way to get the iconic look. If you're a purist about materials & OG highs, skip it. But for a beater pair? Not bad at all. Unboxing this new "jordan air 1" high OG was a vibe. That classic silhouette, the crisp white leather… it just looks right on camera. Putting them on, the break-in period is real; they're not uncomfortable, just… structured. Comparing them to, say, a Jordan 4? Totally different world—this is about clean lines, not tech. The major pro is its history and styling. The downside is the firm midsole. I'd recommend these to sneakerheads who value history, but maybe not to performance basketball players in 2024.
