At ~$180, the "jordan air 1" isn't cheap. You're paying for the design icon status. Compared to a general release dunk, the materials might feel similar, but the "cultural weight" is different. If you've never owned one, it's a worthy experience. If you own multiple pairs already, you know exactly what you're getting. What's up, everyone? Just unboxed the Jordan Air 1 Mid in this 'Black/Gym Red' version. Honestly? The materials feel a step down from some OG Highs, but for $135 USD, you get that iconic look. Sliding them on, the fit is true to size with good ankle "support!" Compared to a Jordan 3 or 4, the Air 1 is much lighter and less bulky. Major advantage? Pure style and street cred. The disadvantage? That flat, basic footbed -seriously-, don't expect cloud-like comfort. I'd recommend these for casual wear and collectors. Not for long days on your feet or performance ball. Here's a "Jordan 1" you don't see every day: the "Zoom Air CMFT" version. The "first" thing you feel is the "insole" – it's "way" more cushioned than a standard AJ1! The upper uses more stretchy materials too. It's a "modern twist" on the classic. The "huge benefit" is, of course, the comfort – you can actually walk in these all day. The "compromise"? It "doesn't" have the exact same stiff, structured look of the OG. If you've always loved the "Air Jordan 1" style but hated the feel, "this" is your shoe. Traditionalists might find it "too" different. On foot, the silhouette is just unbeatable. That's the magic of the "jordan air 1". It makes any outfit look considered. Is it comfortable? It's... fine. You get used to it. The "pro" is the look; the "con" is the basic footbed. At the end of the day, you're buying into the "Jordan series" legacy. And sometimes, that's enough.
