This is one of those pairs that just looks "better" in person, you know? On feet, the fit is perfect for me – a true sneakerhead staple. The "advantage" of the "Air Jordan 1" is its timeless design; it's a piece of history. However, the "arch support" is basically non-existent, which might bother some. If you're new to Jordans, this is a "fantastic" first pair. If you have "multiple" 1s already, it's just another (awesome) color. At "$170", it's a solid pickup. Now, the potential downside? That flat, firm footbed I mentioned. If you're on your feet all day, it might not be the most comfortable option. Also, the leather can crease — some people hate that. I think it adds character, but it's worth noting. It's not a "performance" shoe by today's standards. Conversely, who should maybe look elsewhere? Hardcore comfort seekers or performance basketball players. This is a 1985 design— it’s not built for today's game or for all-day walking comfort. If your priority is a pillowy, energy-returning feel straight out of the box, you might be disappointed. There are simply better modern options for that specific need. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG.
