0'. The grey/black is a forever classic—so clean. Immediately on feet, you feel that secure, locked-in fit. Compared to brighter pairs, these look "sharp" in real life, on camera, everywhere. The major advantage? Timeless versatility. The downside? Like all 1s, the break-in period isn't the most plush. For $170 USD, they're a wardrobe staple. Perfect for anyone wanting a premium, goes-with-anything sneaker. Not ideal for comfort-first runners. Let me know your thoughts—do you prefer the classic leather builds or the newer, more premium material variations on the Jordan Air 1? For me, the simplicity of the OG shapes is still unbeatable. It’s a piece of sneaker history you can wear every day. Just maybe, don’t plan a long city tour in them on day one What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Who should "skip" it? People seeking max comfort or performance basketball shoes. The fit can be narrow, and the cushioning is basic. If tech is your main priority in 2024, this retro Jordan Air 1 isn't for you. It’s about form over cutting-edge function.
