Out of the box, it's a forever classic – you can't go wrong. The leather is stiff initially but will form to your foot. The major advantage? Its sheer versatility with any outfit. The disadvantage is the lack of modern tech; it's a 1985 design, low-top version. For $110 USD, you're buying an icon. Ideal for style-first wearers, not for tech geeks. I have to point out the toe box creasing—it happens, and it happens fast. That's just the nature of the leather on most GR (General Release) pairs. Don't buy these if a pristine look is your top priority. But if you like that worn-in, lived-in aesthetic, the "Nike Air Jordan 1 Low" develops character beautifully. It's a shoe meant to be worn, hard. The major pro for any Air Jordan 1 Low? Unmatched versatility. I can wear these with jeans, shorts, even halfway-dressy pants. They just work. The con? The outsole rubber can be a bit stiff initially, and the leather quality "can" vary by colorway. It’s not a perfect shoe, but it's iconic. Yo, what's up everyone? Just copped this new colorway of the "nike air jordan 1 low". Immediate reaction? The leather quality on this pair is actually decent—no major complaints. On foot, they're "lightweight" and the ankle collar is "less" restrictive than the highs, which I prefer. Compared to my Jordan 1 Mids, the silhouette is nearly identical, just... lower. Big pro? Timeless style. Con? That flat, firm footbed isn't for everyone. Worth it at ~$100? If you love the AJ1 look but want something "less" bulky, this Low is a no-brainer.
