Honestly? For a $125 USD price point, the materials are... acceptable. Not as buttery as the Highs, but the shape is still there. On foot, they feel "lighter" and break in faster. It's a great entry point into the Jordan series. Pro: affordable and tons of color options. Con: purists will always prefer the High OG silhouette. If you're on a budget or just experimenting with style, the Mid is a solid pick. Don't let the hype fool you. Let's be real about the price—around $200 for a retro is steep. But you're buying into the Jordan series' most influential design. The craftsmanship on my 'Bred' pair is good: clean stitching, no glue stains. The "advantage" is unmatched style points. The "downside"? That price tag for tech that's decades old. It's an emotional purchase, not a logical one. Got this "Nike Air Jordan 1" in the 'Stage Haze' colorway. It's a messy, artsy look that I actually dig! For ~$180 USD, it's a statement piece. Fit is TTS, with that typical snug forefoot. What I like? It's different from your standard red/black/white "Jordan 1". What might turn people off? The distressed look isn't for everyone. Perfect for someone wanting to stand out in the "Jordan series". After wearing these for a bit, I appreciate the design even more. The high collar gives ankle support – or at least the feeling of it. They're true to size for me. The outsole grip is fine for everyday. But let's be real, you're not hooping in these seriously. You buy the "nike air jordan 1" for the culture, the flex, the history. And that's okay.
