The box felt heavy—good sign. Unwrapping them, the craftsmanship on this OG version is noticeable. On feet, the fit is secure, but let's be real: the cushioning is basic. You're not buying these for a "cloud-like" ride. Visually, though? "Chef's kiss". They pop on camera. Compared to a Mid, the High's collar just looks more authentic. Worth the $180? For a staple colorway, absolutely. For pure performance? Nah. Finally, let's discuss the "nike air jordan 1" 'Royal' re-release. The box is classic, the black and blue is just timeless. This is the epitome of the Jordan series origin story. On foot, it's the definitive high-top basketball sneaker feel – from 1985. The ankle support is great, but the forefoot is board-like. At today's prices (~$200+ USD), it's an investment in a icon. Pro: Unbeatable heritage and versatility in a wardrobe. Con: Archaic comfort technology. It's perfect for completing a sneaker collection, but I wouldn't recommend it for your first – or only – "comfortable" sneaker. Comparing it to my other Jordans... The "Air Jordan 1" sits at the foundation, you know? It's simpler than a tech-heavy Jordan 13 or 35. That's its biggest "pro" — pure, uncomplicated style. The $180 feels like an investment in sneaker history. Con? It lacks the modern tech newer models have. So, it's not for performance ball. It's for lifestyle. On feet, walking around? You feel the history. Compared to a modern Jordan like the 36, it's night and day – the AJ1 is heavier, more rigid. But that's not a bad thing! It's a stable, grounded feel. The leather will crease, that's just part of the story. For $180? You're buying a piece of sneaker culture, not a performance beast. It's a trade-off.