At $135 USD, it's a more accessible price point. The materials feel a bit less premium than the High OGs, which is the main trade-off. On feet, the fit is similar - snug through the midfoot. The lower cut makes them feel a bit less bulky, honestly. For casual, everyday fits, they work perfectly. The advantage is the price and colorway simplicity. The disadvantage is sneakerheads might scoff at the Mid silhouette. I'd say these are ideal for someone wanting the AJ1 look on a budget, not for OG purists. Comparing it to my other Jordans... the 1 feels more like a historical artifact. The 3s, 4s, and 11s often have more tech and comfort. But the 1? It's about the statement. Putting on this 'Bred' colorway is an experience – it feels powerful. You're wearing a piece of history, and that vibe is unmatched by most modern releases. First impressions of this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" 'Panda'? It's clean, it's simple, and for about $125 USD, it's one of the most accessible pairs. The leather is a bit more synthetic, which isn't a huge surprise at this price point. But on-foot? Super comfortable for daily wear! Compared to a pricier High OG, you sacrifice some premium materials - but for a versatile, go-anywhere sneaker in the "Jordan 1" lineup, it gets the job done. Is it worth it? If you're building a sneaker collection, 100% yes. The "nike air jordan 1" is a foundational piece. For a first-time Jordan buyer, this "Chicago" colorway (or a similar classic) is the perfect start. It's history you can wear. However, if your priority is gym performance or marathon comfort, this isn't your shoe. Know what you're buying.