The cushioning from the Air unit is there—it's not super plush like some modern shoes, but it's comfortable for all-day wear. The fit is true to size for me, with a nice, secure lockdown around the midfoot. The low-cut design definitely offers more ankle mobility compared to the OG highs. Now, a potential con for some people: the cushioning tech is dated. If you're used to modern, pillowy-soft sneakers, the "Nike Air Jordan 6 Low" might feel a bit stiff initially. It breaks in, but don't buy these expecting a cloud-like feel. That's the trade-off with many classic retros. It's part of the authentic experience, but not for everyone. Who might want to skip it? Hardcore comfort seekers, please look elsewhere. Also, if you're only into the latest tech or maximal cushioning, this isn't for you. And purists who believe the "Jordan 6" should only be a high-top might not vibe with the low version. It's a specific style choice. For performance basketball, obviously, there are far better modern options. Know what you're buying into. Comparing it to other Jordans? The "6 Low" is less bulky than the "Jordan 4" and more unique than the ubiquitous "Jordan 1". It occupies a cool middle ground. Within the "Jordan 6" family itself, the low-top version loses some of the iconic, protective feel of the high but gains in everyday wearability. It's a different experience. For $200 USD, you're paying for the design heritage and versatility more than cutting-edge features.
