As a women's exclusive cut, the fit feels true-to-size & secure around my heel. Compared to my high-tops, the "womens Air Jordan 1 Low" is obviously way easier to just slip on & go. Perfect for errands or a relaxed fit. Just got these in: the womens air jordan 1 low 'Starfish'—a clean, orange-ish pair. Unboxing felt fresh; color is vibrant but not overwhelming. Sliding them on, the break-in is real, folks. They're stiff out of the box. The silhouette, though? "Chef's kiss." It's a lower, slightly more streamlined version of the classic. For $125, it's a fair price for a leather sneaker of this legacy. Pro: Unique color that still feels classic. Con: Requires some patience to get comfortable. Best for collectors of colorways, maybe not for your only pair of shoes. Honest review time. This "Elephant Print" edition of the "womens air jordan 1 low" is a statement. The craftsmanship on the print is actually really neat! On-foot feel is the same reliable, slightly stiff AJ1 low experience. I love the unique look—it stands out from the sea of solid colors. The potential downside? The bold print might be harder to style daily for some. But if you love the Jordan series and want something different, this ~$130 pair is a fun pick. Alright, so I just got the "Womens Air Jordan 1 Low" in this clean "White and University Red" colorway. Unboxing, the leather feels "pretty" decent for the price point, around $100 USD. Sliding them on? Immediate classic Jordan 1 comfort—or lack thereof, you know the deal. They're flat, supportive, but not "plush". The "big" pro here is the versatility. That iconic low-top silhouette goes with "everything". Just don't expect a cloud-like feel. If you're new to the Jordan series and want a staple, this is it. If you need serious cushioning, look elsewhere.

  • Shown: Hyper Royal
  • Style: DB4612-300

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5