Literally! The patent leather is a statement. On foot, they're a bit stiffer than the standard leather versions. They're louder, for sure. I love them for special fits, but they're not an everyday beater. Worth the premium? If you love the look, yes. If you want subtlety, maybe grab a classic matte pair instead. Conversely, who should "avoid" it? If you’re on your feet all day and need cloud-like comfort — look elsewhere (maybe a Jordan 13). If you have very wide feet, the narrow fit can be "truly" uncomfortable. This shoe demands a bit of a sacrifice for the sake of style. Be honest with your needs. Now, a real con? That stiff leather upper can be brutal during the break-in period. Your first few wears might include some blisters—especially around the ankle. It gets better, but it's not a "comfort-first" shoe out of the box. Just being 100% honest with you all. Comparing it to other "Jordan" models is key. Versus a Jordan 4 or 5? The "air jordan 1 high" is lighter and less bulky. Versus a Jordan 1 Low? The High offers way more ankle support (and classic vibe). The "con"? That support means break-in time. It’s not a slip-on-and-go shoe. You’re buying into the "history and the look" more than tech.
