Air jordan 1 high : Comparing it to, say, a Jordan 4 or 5? It's a different world [coei4y2j]

Those have more tech, more cushioning. The "Air Jordan 1 High" is simpler, more rigid—but also more versatile for everyday style. It's the blueprint. The appeal is totally different: one's for performance heritage, the other is a pure style icon. Comparing it to other Jordans... the "Air Jordan 1 High" is the foundation. Next to an AJ1 Low, you gain that iconic ankle collar but lose some flexibility. Versus a cushioned J like the AJ13? Totally different world. This is about heritage, not performance. The pros? Unmatched style history and a build that lasts. Cons? That break-in period can be real for some. Just got this pair in, the "Air Jordan 1 High" 'Bordeaux'. Wow, that deep purple and black is "really" elegant in-hand. A more mature colorway in the Jordan series, for sure. Putting them on, the construction feels sturdy. They have some weight to them, but not in a bad way—it feels substantial. The leather is decent. Pro: Unique color that stands out from the usual reds and blues. Con: Like all AJ1 Highs, they're not the most breathable. I'd say these are for collectors or style-minded folks wanting something different. Performance basketball players, look at newer models. Initial on-foot thoughts on the "Air Jordan 1 High" 'Taxi' colorway. That smooth leather and bold yellow really shine! For $180 USD, you get a well-made, classic sneaker. They feel secure, but break-in is necessary. Versus a Jordan 4, these are definitely less bulky. The pro is versatility; the con is the break-in period for the collar. I'd recommend these to anyone building a rotation of classics. Not for someone seeking modern, all-day comfort.

  • Shown: Pure Money
  • Style: DM9036-104
$402
$945 -18%
Quantity :